Risk assessment of invasive taxa in Sweden | Swedish Biodiversity Data Infrastructure
List name
Risk assessment of invasive taxa in Sweden
List type
Conservation list
Description
List of risk assessed taxa known to have been introduced to Sweden, or taxa that could be introduced, and where the risk for invasiveness was assessed as ‘Very high risk’, ‘High risk’ or ‘Potentially high risk’ according to the analyses made 2018–2019 through the risk assessment method GEIAA (https://www.artdatabanken.se/globalassets/ew/subw/artd/1-om-arter-och-natur/om-biologisk-mangfald/om-frammande-arter/gl-3-3.pdf). For the full list see https://www.artdatabanken.se/globalassets/ew/subw/artd/2.-var-verksamhet/publikationer/29.-artdatabankens-risklista/rapport_klassifisering_av_frammande_arter2.pdf or https://artfakta.se/naturvard/filter/35-fr%C3%A4mmande-arter.
URL
https://www.gbif.se/ipt/resource?r=riskassessmentofinvasivetaxa
WKT (GIS feature)
POLYGON((10.74 55.16,24.37 55.16,24.37 69.13,10.74 69.13,10.74 55.16))
Date submitted
2021-06-17
Last Update
2021-07-01
Date last uploaded
2021-07-01
Date last matched
2021-07-01
Is private
No
Included in species pages
No
Authoritative
No
Invasive
No
Threatened
No
Part of the sensitive data service
No
Region
Not provided
Loose Name Search
Metadata Link
https://collections.biodiversitydata.se/public/show/dr203

4 Number of Taxa

2 Distinct Species

Refine results

thumbnail species image
Magallana gigas
Magallana gigas (Thunberg, 1793)
japanskt jätteostron
 
thumbnail species image
Magallana gigas
Magallana gigas (Thunberg, 1793)
japanskt jätteostron
 
thumbnail species image
Magallana gigas
Magallana gigas (Thunberg, 1793)
japanskt jätteostron
 
thumbnail species image
Crassostrea angulata
Crassostrea angulata (Thunberg, 1793)
Portuguese oyster
 
Action Supplied Name Scientific Name (matched) Kingdom Family Image Common Name (matched) kingdom family order class phylum genus taxonRank id taxonID acceptedNameUsageID scientificNameAuthorship taxonomicStatus nomenclaturalStatus taxonRemarks
Crassostrea gigas Magallana gigas
japanskt jätteostron
Author(s): (Thunberg, 1793)
Animalia - Mollusca - Bivalvia - Ostreida - Ostreidae - Magallana
japanskt jätteostron
Animalia
Ostreidae
Ostreoida
Bivalvia
Mollusca
Crassostrea
species
urn:lsid:dyntaxa.se:Taxon:249392
urn:lsid:dyntaxa.se:Taxon:249392
urn:lsid:dyntaxa.se:Taxon:249392
(Thunberg, 1793)
accepted
valid
Magallana gigas Magallana gigas
japanskt jätteostron
Author(s): (Thunberg, 1793)
Animalia - Mollusca - Bivalvia - Ostreida - Ostreidae - Magallana
japanskt jätteostron
Animalia
Ostreidae
Ostreoida
Bivalvia
Mollusca
Crassostrea
species
urn:lsid:dyntaxa.se:TaxonName:406509
urn:lsid:dyntaxa.se:TaxonName:406509
urn:lsid:dyntaxa.se:Taxon:249392
(Thunberg, 1793)
homotypicSynonym
valid
Ostrea gigas Magallana gigas
japanskt jätteostron
Author(s): (Thunberg, 1793)
Animalia - Mollusca - Bivalvia - Ostreida - Ostreidae - Magallana
japanskt jätteostron
Animalia
Ostreidae
Ostreoida
Bivalvia
Mollusca
Crassostrea
species
urn:lsid:dyntaxa.se:TaxonName:406512
urn:lsid:dyntaxa.se:TaxonName:406512
urn:lsid:dyntaxa.se:Taxon:249392
Thunberg, 1793
homotypicSynonym
valid
Crassostrea angulata Crassostrea angulata
Portuguese oyster
Author(s): (Thunberg, 1793)
Animalia - Mollusca - Bivalvia - Ostreida - Ostreidae - Crassostrea
Portuguese oyster
Animalia
Ostreidae
Ostreoida
Bivalvia
Mollusca
Crassostrea
species
urn:lsid:dyntaxa.se:TaxonName:147246
urn:lsid:dyntaxa.se:TaxonName:147246
urn:lsid:dyntaxa.se:Taxon:249392
(Lamarck, 1819)
misapplied
valid
The Portuguese oyster Crassostrea angulata and the Japanese oyster Crassostrea gigas were described as distinct species with widely separated geographical origins - southwestern Europe and Japan respectively. In the 1970's C. gigas was introduced to the Atlantic coast of France in order to restore oyster farming affected by a disease of C. angulata, and it became evident that the two species could hybridize (Menzel, 1974, Huvet et al., 2004) and therefore were treated as synonyms (Huber, 2010). During the recent years, however, several genetic studies based on mitochondrial DNA and microsatellite data have provided evidence that the two taxa are genetically distinct although closely related (see overview in Batista et al. 2005). Particularly, an average of 2.3% difference in CO1 sequence suggests that populations of C. gigas and C. angulata may have diverged several hundred thousand years ago (Hedgecock et al., 2004). Studies involving microsatellite markers have shown that there are low but clear genetic differences between the two taxons. From all recent studies, it seems clear that the European C. angulata was introduced in the XVI or XVIIth century from Taiwan, and can be recognized genetically from C. gigas introduced later from Japan. Nevertheless the relationship of both taxa in intermediate locations remains to be elucidated. Lapègue et al. (2004) reported characteristic haplotypes of both C. gigas and C. angulata occurred in a population from northern China locally known as C. talienwhanensis Crosse, 1862; this could either mean that both species are distinct but overlap ranges, or that all those haplotypes are to be found in a single, geographically variable species. Considering this state of the art, C. angulata and C. gigas are listed here separately but qualified as very closely related and still possibly conspecific.
Items per page: