- List name
- Risk assessment of invasive taxa in Sweden
- List type
- Conservation list
- Description
- List of risk assessed taxa known to have been introduced to Sweden, or taxa that could be introduced, and where the risk for invasiveness was assessed as ‘Very high risk’, ‘High risk’ or ‘Potentially high risk’ according to the analyses made 2018–2019 through the risk assessment method GEIAA (https://www.artdatabanken.se/globalassets/ew/subw/artd/1-om-arter-och-natur/om-biologisk-mangfald/om-frammande-arter/gl-3-3.pdf). For the full list see https://www.artdatabanken.se/globalassets/ew/subw/artd/2.-var-verksamhet/publikationer/29.-artdatabankens-risklista/rapport_klassifisering_av_frammande_arter2.pdf or https://artfakta.se/naturvard/filter/35-fr%C3%A4mmande-arter.
- URL
- https://www.gbif.se/ipt/resource?r=riskassessmentofinvasivetaxa
- WKT (GIS feature)
- POLYGON((10.74 55.16,24.37 55.16,24.37 69.13,10.74 69.13,10.74 55.16))
- Date submitted
- 2021-06-17
- Last Update
- 2021-07-01
- Date last uploaded
- 2021-07-01
- Date last matched
- 2021-07-01
- Is private
- No
- Included in species pages
- No
- Authoritative
- No
- Invasive
- No
- Threatened
- No
- Part of the sensitive data service
- No
- Region
- Not provided
- Loose Name Search
- Metadata Link
- https://collections.biodiversitydata.se/public/show/dr203
Refine results
Refine results
Current Filters
scientificNameAuthorship
taxonomicStatus
Action | Supplied Name | Scientific Name (matched) Kingdom Family | Image | Common Name (matched) | kingdom | family | order | class | phylum | genus | taxonRank | id | taxonID | acceptedNameUsageID | scientificNameAuthorship | taxonomicStatus | nomenclaturalStatus | taxonRemarks |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Crassostrea gigas |
Magallana gigas
japanskt jätteostron Author(s): (Thunberg, 1793) Animalia - Mollusca - Bivalvia - Ostreida - Ostreidae - Magallana |
japanskt jätteostron | Animalia
|
Ostreidae
|
Ostreoida
|
Bivalvia
|
Mollusca
|
Crassostrea
|
species
|
urn:lsid:dyntaxa.se:Taxon:249392
|
urn:lsid:dyntaxa.se:Taxon:249392
|
urn:lsid:dyntaxa.se:Taxon:249392
|
(Thunberg, 1793)
|
accepted
|
valid
|
|||
Magallana gigas |
Magallana gigas
japanskt jätteostron Author(s): (Thunberg, 1793) Animalia - Mollusca - Bivalvia - Ostreida - Ostreidae - Magallana |
japanskt jätteostron | Animalia
|
Ostreidae
|
Ostreoida
|
Bivalvia
|
Mollusca
|
Crassostrea
|
species
|
urn:lsid:dyntaxa.se:TaxonName:406509
|
urn:lsid:dyntaxa.se:TaxonName:406509
|
urn:lsid:dyntaxa.se:Taxon:249392
|
(Thunberg, 1793)
|
homotypicSynonym
|
valid
|
|||
Ostrea gigas |
Magallana gigas
japanskt jätteostron Author(s): (Thunberg, 1793) Animalia - Mollusca - Bivalvia - Ostreida - Ostreidae - Magallana |
japanskt jätteostron | Animalia
|
Ostreidae
|
Ostreoida
|
Bivalvia
|
Mollusca
|
Crassostrea
|
species
|
urn:lsid:dyntaxa.se:TaxonName:406512
|
urn:lsid:dyntaxa.se:TaxonName:406512
|
urn:lsid:dyntaxa.se:Taxon:249392
|
Thunberg, 1793
|
homotypicSynonym
|
valid
|
|||
Crassostrea angulata |
Crassostrea angulata
Portuguese oyster Author(s): (Thunberg, 1793) Animalia - Mollusca - Bivalvia - Ostreida - Ostreidae - Crassostrea |
Portuguese oyster | Animalia
|
Ostreidae
|
Ostreoida
|
Bivalvia
|
Mollusca
|
Crassostrea
|
species
|
urn:lsid:dyntaxa.se:TaxonName:147246
|
urn:lsid:dyntaxa.se:TaxonName:147246
|
urn:lsid:dyntaxa.se:Taxon:249392
|
(Lamarck, 1819)
|
misapplied
|
valid
|
The Portuguese oyster Crassostrea angulata and the Japanese oyster Crassostrea gigas were described as distinct species with widely separated geographical origins - southwestern Europe and Japan respectively. In the 1970's C. gigas was introduced to the Atlantic coast of France in order to restore oyster farming affected by a disease of C. angulata, and it became evident that the two species could hybridize (Menzel, 1974, Huvet et al., 2004) and therefore were treated as synonyms (Huber, 2010). During the recent years, however, several genetic studies based on mitochondrial DNA and microsatellite data have provided evidence that the two taxa are genetically distinct although closely related (see overview in Batista et al. 2005). Particularly, an average of 2.3% difference in CO1 sequence suggests that populations of C. gigas and C. angulata may have diverged several hundred thousand years ago (Hedgecock et al., 2004). Studies involving microsatellite markers have shown that there are low but clear genetic differences between the two taxons. From all recent studies, it seems clear that the European C. angulata was introduced in the XVI or XVIIth century from Taiwan, and can be recognized genetically from C. gigas introduced later from Japan. Nevertheless the relationship of both taxa in intermediate locations remains to be elucidated. Lapègue et al. (2004) reported characteristic haplotypes of both C. gigas and C. angulata occurred in a population from northern China locally known as C. talienwhanensis Crosse, 1862; this could either mean that both species are distinct but overlap ranges, or that all those haplotypes are to be found in a single, geographically variable species. Considering this state of the art, C. angulata and C. gigas are listed here separately but qualified as very closely related and still possibly conspecific.
|
Items per page: