The Swedish Red List 2020 | Swedish Biodiversity Data Infrastructure
List name
The Swedish Red List 2020
List type
Conservation list
Description
The Swedish Red List is produced by the Swedish Species Information Centre at SLU. The evaluations were made in collaboration with more than 100 experts, subdivided into 14 committees treating different organism groups. The Swedish Red List 2020, published on April 22 2020, is the fifth Swedish Red List based on the international IUCN criteria. The end product is two-fold, the actual redlist with species assessments and an analysis report. They are available both in printed editions and digitally. Further reading, species-specific information and analysis of results are available at www.artdatabanken.se.
URL
https://www.gbif.se/ipt/resource?r=swedishredlist2020
WKT (GIS feature)
POLYGON((10.74 55.16,24.37 55.16,24.37 69.13,10.74 69.13,10.74 55.16))
Date submitted
2021-06-17
Last Update
2021-09-28
Date last uploaded
2021-09-28
Date last matched
2021-09-28
Is private
No
Included in species pages
No
Authoritative
Yes
Invasive
No
Threatened
Yes
Part of the sensitive data service
No
Region
Not provided
Loose Name Search
Metadata Link
https://collections.biodiversitydata.se/public/show/dr204

1 Number of Taxa

1 Distinct Species

Refine results

thumbnail species image
Ampelisca typica
Ampelisca typica (Spence Bate, 1857)
 
Action Supplied Name Scientific Name (matched) Kingdom Family Image Common Name (matched) kingdom family order class phylum genus taxonRank id taxonID acceptedNameUsageID scientificNameAuthorship taxonomicStatus nomenclaturalStatus taxonRemarks
Tetromatus typicus Ampelisca typica
Author(s): (Spence Bate, 1857)
Animalia - Arthropoda - Malacostraca - Amphipoda - Ampeliscidae - Ampelisca
Animalia
Ampeliscidae
Amphipoda
Malacostraca
Arthropoda
Ampelisca
species
urn:lsid:dyntaxa.se:TaxonName:435636
urn:lsid:dyntaxa.se:TaxonName:435636
urn:lsid:dyntaxa.se:Taxon:234284
Spence Bate, 1856
synonym
valid
Both Boeck (1871) and Sars (1891) state that this species was originally described in Spence Bate (1856). Boeck even specifies that the description is found on p. 58. Tetromatus typicus is, indeed, mentioned on p. 58 of Spence Bate (1856) - but only in the form of the name and a note "mihi" (i.e. described by me). But even though there seems to be no proper verbal description of the species in Spence Bate (1856), the illustrations towards the end of the book may, I suppose, serve as a description. WoRMS cites the year 1857 for Tetromalus typicus (which they label "basionym"), an it may be that Spence Bate described the species verbally somewhere that year, but if so, WoRMS regretably provides no information on the source.
Items per page: